Moral Distress in Nursing Care

Moral Distress in Nursing Introduction

Moral distress is a significant issue in nursing practice, affecting not only the well-being of nurses but also the quality of patient care. Defined as the anguish experienced when one knows the right course of action but is constrained from pursuing it due to real or perceived obstacles, moral distress can have profound implications for both individuals and healthcare systems. This comprehensive exploration will delve into what moral distress is, its sources and factors, the roles of nurses and physicians, environmental contributions, psychological impacts, and its effect on patient care quality.

---

What is Moral Distress?

Moral distress occurs when an individual recognizes a moral issue, understands the ethical course of action, but is unable to act accordingly due to various constraints. The term “moral” refers to judgments about right or wrong actions or responsibilities, while “distress” signifies a severe negative emotional and psychological response (Nathaniel, 2004). This distress manifests in affective, physical, and relational domains, resulting in profound suffering.

Andrew Jameton, who first introduced the concept, defined moral distress as arising when one knows the right thing to do but institutional constraints make it nearly impossible to follow through with the appropriate action (Jameton, 1984). This definition highlights the disconnect between ethical awareness and the ability to act on it, which can lead to significant psychological and emotional turmoil.

Sources of Moral Distress

The concept of moral distress was initially recognized by ethicist Andrew Jameton, who noted that nurses’ experiences of moral dilemmas were often more about the inability to act on known ethical principles than about choosing between equally viable options (Jameton, 1984). This realization led to a refined definition in which moral distress is characterized by a failure to act according to one’s moral judgment due to external constraints (Jameton, 1993; Wilkinson, 1987-88).

Sources of moral distress can be diverse and multifaceted, including:

1. Institutional Constraints: Restrictions imposed by healthcare institutions, such as policies or lack of resources, can prevent nurses from providing the care they believe is ethically necessary.
2. Conflicting Moral Values: Discrepancies between personal values and institutional policies or practices can lead to moral distress. For example, a nurse might feel compelled to perform interventions that prolong suffering due to institutional protocols.
3. Hierarchical Pressure: Power dynamics within healthcare settings can force nurses into situations where they must comply with decisions made by higher authorities, even when these decisions conflict with their moral beliefs.

Factors Contributing to Moral Distress

Several factors contribute to the development of moral distress, which often arises in high-stress situations or with vulnerable patient populations:

1. Work Environment: High-stress areas such as critical care units often see higher instances of moral distress due to the intense and emotionally charged nature of the work (Bassett, 1995; Corley, 1995).
2. Ethical Dilemmas: Situations such as prolonging the suffering of dying patients through aggressive treatments, performing unnecessary tests, or failing to involve patients and families in decision-making can trigger moral distress (Wilkinson, 1987-88).
3. Personal Attributes: Individual characteristics such as moral sensitivity and ethical orientation play a role in how nurses experience and respond to moral distress (Hefferman & Heilig, 1999).
4. Organizational Factors: Organizational elements such as inadequate support, poor communication, and lack of ethical resources contribute significantly to the moral distress experienced by nurses (Fenton, 1988; Wilkinson).

Nurses’ Roles in Moral Distress

Nurses play a critical role in both experiencing and addressing moral distress. Their sense of moral responsibility, their perceptions of control over patient outcomes, and their personal moral judgments all influence their experience of distress:

1. Moral Responsibility: Nurses’ perceived responsibility for patient outcomes can heighten their sense of distress when they are unable to act in line with their moral judgments (Wilkinson, 1987-88).
2. Moral Judgment: The way nurses interpret and respond to moral issues is influenced by their personal values and ethical frameworks. Moral distress often results from actions that nurses personally judge to be wrong, even if those actions are sanctioned by institutional policies (Wilkinson, 1987-88).
3. Response Variability: Individual responses to moral problems can vary widely based on moral awareness, orientation toward consequences or rules, and focus on justice versus caring (Millette, 1994).

Environmental Contribution to Moral Distress

The environment in which nurses work significantly impacts their experience of moral distress. Institutional settings often contribute to moral distress through:

1. Hierarchical Systems: Nurses may feel powerless within hierarchical systems that prioritize orders and directives over ethical considerations. This powerlessness can exacerbate feelings of moral distress (Wilkinson, 1987-88; Rodney, 1988).
2. Lack of Support: Insufficient support from nursing and hospital administrations can leave nurses feeling isolated and unable to address ethical concerns effectively (Fenton, 1988).
3. Organizational Ethics: The presence or absence of organizational ethics resources, and the overall practice environment, influence the level of moral distress experienced by nurses (Wilkinson).

Role of Nurses vs. Physicians in Moral Distress

The roles of nurses and physicians in moral distress can differ significantly due to varying perspectives and decision-making processes:

1. Conflicting Moral Orientations: Nurses and physicians often have different moral orientations and decision-making approaches, which can lead to conflicting judgments about the appropriate course of action (Wilkinson, 1987-88; Bassett, 1995).
2. Decision-Making Perspectives: Physicians may focus on medical outcomes and interventions, while nurses may emphasize holistic care and patient comfort. These differing perspectives can contribute to moral distress when their views are not aligned (Corley, 1995).
3. Adversarial Relationships: The often adversarial relationship between nurses and physicians can exacerbate moral distress, particularly when nurses feel that their ethical concerns are dismissed or undervalued (Wilkinson; Bassett; Corley).

Psychological Factors of Moral Distress

Moral distress has profound psychological and physical impacts on nurses:

1. Psychosocial Indicators: Symptoms of moral distress include self-blame, anger, guilt, frustration, sadness, withdrawal, and burnout. These symptoms reflect the deep emotional and psychological toll of moral distress (Wilkinson, 1987-88; Fenton, 1998).
2. Physical Complaints: Nurses may also experience physical symptoms such as headaches, sleep disturbances, and gastrointestinal issues as a result of moral distress (Fenton; Wilkinson; Nathaniel, 2004).
3. Behavioral Changes: In response to moral distress, nurses may exhibit behaviors such as emotional detachment, avoidance, or even leaving the profession altogether (Fenton; Hefferman & Heilig, 1999).

Moral Distress and Quality of Patient Care

The impact of moral distress on patient care is significant and multifaceted:

1. Reduced Capacity for Caring: Nurses experiencing moral distress may lose their ability to provide empathetic and effective care, potentially leading to a decline in the quality of patient interactions (Hefferman & Heilig, 1999; Wilkinson, 1987-88).
2. Withdrawal from Patient Care: In severe cases, moral distress can lead to physical and emotional withdrawal from patient care, where nurses may only meet basic needs rather than engaging in comprehensive, compassionate care (Millette, 1994; Corley, 1995).
3. Systemic Implications: Moral distress affects not only individual nurses but also the broader healthcare system, contributing to issues such as staff turnover, decreased job satisfaction, and diminished patient care quality (Nathaniel, 2004).

Conclusion

Moral distress is a complex and pervasive issue in nursing, with profound implications for both nurses and patients. Understanding its sources, factors, and impacts is essential for addressing this issue effectively. By recognizing the roles of nurses and physicians, the contributions of environmental factors, and the psychological effects, healthcare systems can better support nurses in managing moral distress. Ensuring that ethical concerns are addressed and providing adequate support can help mitigate the negative consequences of moral distress, ultimately improving both nurse well-being and patient care quality. Continued research and systemic changes are needed to address this critical issue and promote a more supportive and ethically sound healthcare environment.