Research Interviews How to Plan and Conduct: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Plan and Conduct Research Interviews: A Step-by-Step Guide. To plan and conduct research interviews, first define your objectives and select participants.

A Step-by-Step Guide: How to Plan and Conduct Research Interviews

The Seven Stages of Interview Investigation

To, develop a detailed interview guide with open-ended and unbiased questions and prepare logistical aspects such as recording and scheduling. During the interview, create a comfortable environment, listen actively, and maintain professional ethics. Finally, transcribe and analyze the data to draw conclusions. Kvale (1996:88) sets out seven stages of an interview investigation that can be used to plan this type of research:

Thematizing Your Research

Formulate the purpose of an investigation and describe the concept of the topic to be investigated before the interviews start. The why and what of the investigation should be clarified before the question of how—method—is posed.

Designing Plan the design of the study, taking into consideration all seven stages of the investigation, before the interviewing starts.
Interviewing Conduct the interviews based on an interview guide and with a reflective approach to the knowledge sought and the interpersonal relation of the interview situation.
Transcribing Prepare the interview material for analysis, this commonly includes a transcription from oral speech to written text.
Analyzing Decide, on the basis of the purpose and topic of the investigation, and on the nature of the interview material, which methods of analysis are appropriate for the interviews?
Verifying Ascertain the generalizability, reliability, and validity of the interview findings.
Reporting Communicate the findings of the study and the methods applied in a form that lives up to scientific criteria, takes the ethical aspects of the investigation into consideration, and that results in a readable product. We use these to structure our comments here about the planning of interview-based research.

Defining Your Research Purpose and Objectives

The preliminary stage of an interview study will be the point where the purpose of the research is decided. It may begin by outlining the theoretical basis of the study, its broad aims, its practical value and the reasons why the interview approach was chosen.

There may then follow the translation of the general goals of the research into more detailed and specific objectives. This is the most important step, for only careful formulation of objectives at this point will eventually produce the right kind of data necessary for satisfactory answers to the research problem.

Designing Your Interview Study

Preparing the Interview Schedule

There follows the preparation of the interview schedule itself. This involves translating the research objectives into the questions that will make up the main body of the schedule. This needs to be done in such a way that the questions adequately reflect what it is the researcher is trying to find out. It is quite usual to begin this task by writing down the variables to be dealt with in the study.

As one commentator says, The first step in constructing interview questions is to specify your variables by name. Your variables are what you are trying to measure. They tell you where to begin’ (Tuckman, 1972). Before the actual interview items are pre pared, it is desirable to give some thought to the question format and the response mode.

Key Factors in Choosing Question Format

The choice of question format, for instance, depends on a consideration of one or more of the following factors:

The objectives of the interview
The nature of the subject matter
Whether the interviewer is dealing in facts, opinions or attitudes
Whether specificity or depth is sought
The respondent’s level of education
The kind of information she can be expected to have
Whether or not her thought needs to be structured; some assessment of her motivational level
The extent of the interviewer’s own insight into the respondent’s situation
The kind of relationship the interviewer can expect to develop with the respondent

Having given prior thought to these matters, the researcher is in a position to decide whether to use open and/or closed questions, direct and/or indirect questions, specific and/or non-specific questions, and so on.

Construction of Interview Schedules

Three kinds of items are used in the construction of schedules used in research interviews (see Kerlinger, 1970).

Fixed-Alternative Items

First, ‘fixed-alternative’ items allow the respondent to choose from two or more alternatives. The most frequently used is the dichotomous item which offers two alternatives only: ‘yes-no’ or ‘agree-disagree’, for instance. Sometimes a third alternative such as ‘undecided’ or ‘don’t know’ is also offered. Example: Do you feel it is against the interests of a school to have to make public its examination results? Yes No Don’t knows Kerlinger has identified the chief advantages and disadvantages of fixed-alternative items.

They have, for example, the advantage of achieving greater uniformity of measurement and therefore greater reliability; of making the respondents answer in a manner fitting the response category; and of being more easily coded.

Disadvantages include their superficiality; the possibility of irritating respondents who find none of the alternatives suitable; and the possibility of forcing responses that are inappropriate, either because the alternative chosen conceals ignorance on the part of the respondent or because she may choose an alternative that does not accurately represent the true facts.

These weaknesses can be overcome, however, if the items are written with care, mixed with open ended ones, and used in conjunction with probes on the part of the interviewer.

Open-Ended Items

Second, ‘open-ended items’ have been succinctly defined by Kerlinger as ‘those that supply a frame of reference for respondents’ answers, but put a minimum of restraint on the answers and their expression’ (Kerlinger, 1970). Other than the subject of the question, which is determined by the nature of the problem under investigation, there are no other restrictions on either the content or the manner of the interviewee’s reply.

Example: What kind of television programmes do you most prefer to watch?

Open-ended questions have a number of advantages: they are flexible; they allow the inter viewer to probe so that she may go into more depth if she chooses, or to clear up any misunderstandings; they enable the interviewer to test the limits of the respondent’s knowledge; they encourage co-operation and help establish rap port; and they allow the interviewer to make a truer assessment of what the respondent really believes. Open-ended situations can also result in unexpected or unanticipated answers which may suggest hitherto unthought-of relationships or hypotheses.

A particular kind of open-ended question is the ‘funnel’ to which reference has been made earlier. This starts, the reader will recall, with a broad question or statement and then narrows down to more specific ones. Kerlinger (1970) quotes an example from the study by Sears, Maccoby and Levin (1957): All babies cry, of course. Some mothers feel that if you pick up a baby every time it cries, you will spoil it. Others think you should never let a baby cry for very long. How do you feel about this? What did you do about it? How about the middle of the night? (Sears, Maccoby and Levin, 1957)

Scale Items

Third, the ‘scale’ is, as we have already seen, a set of verbal items to each of which the inter viewee responds by indicating degrees of agreement or disagreement. The individual’s response is thus located on a scale of fixed alternatives. The use of this technique along with open-ended questions is a comparatively recent development and means that scale scores can be checked against data elicited by the open-ended questions. Example: Attendance at school after the age of 14 should be voluntary:

Strongly agree

Agree

Undecided Disagree

Strongly disagree

It is possible to use one of a number of scales in this context: attitude scales, rank-order scales, rating scales, and so on. We touch upon this subject again subsequently.

Question Formats for Effective Interviewing

We now look at the kinds of questions and modes of response associated with interviewing. First, the matter of question format: how is a question to be phrased or organized? (see Wilson, 1996). Tuckman (1972) has listed four such formats that an interviewer may draw upon.

Direct vs. Indirect Questions

Questions may, for example, take a direct or indirect form. Thus an interviewer could ask a teacher whether she likes teaching: this would be a direct question. Or else she could adopt an indirect approach by asking for the respondent’s views on education in general and the ways schools function.

From the answers proffered, the interviewer could make inferences about the teacher’s opinions concerning her own job. Tuckman suggests that by making the purpose of questions less obvious, the indirect approach is more likely to produce frank and open responses.

General vs. Specific Questions

There are also those kinds of questions which deal with either a general or specific issue. To ask a child what she thought of the teaching methods of the staff as a whole would be a general or non-specific question. To ask her what she thought of her teacher as a teacher would be a specific question. There is also the sequence of questions designated the funnel in which the movement is from the general and non-specific to the more specific.

Tuckman comments, ‘Specific questions, like direct ones, may cause a respondent to become cautious or guarded and give less-than-honest answers. Non-specific questions may lead circuitously to the desired information but with less alarm by the respondents’ (Tuckman, 1972). A further distinction is that between questions inviting factual answers and those inviting opinions. Both fact and opinion questions can yield less than the truth, however: the former do not always do not produce factual answers; nor do the latter necessarily elicit honest opinions. In both instances, inaccuracy and bias may be minimized by careful structuring of the questions.

Types of Questions by Content

There are several ways of categorizing questions, for example (Spradley, 1979; Patton, 1980):

Descriptive questions
Experience questions
Behaviour questions
Knowledge questions
Construct-forming questions;
Contrast questions (asking respondents to contrast one thing with another)
Feeling questions
Sensory questions
Background questions
Demographic questions

Process Questions in Interviews

These concern the substance of the question. Kvale (1996:133–5) adds to these what might be termed the process questions, i.e. questions that:

Introduce a topic or interview
Follow-up on a topic or idea
Probe for further information or response
Ask respondents to specify and provide examples
Directly ask for information
Indirectly ask for information
Interpret respondents’ replies

We may also note that an interviewee may be presented with either a question or a statement. In the case of the latter she will be asked for her response to it in one form or another. Example question: Do you think homework should be compulsory for all children between 11 and 16? Example statement: Homework should be compulsory for all children between 11 and 16 years old. Agree Disagree Don’t know.

Response Modes: How Interviewees Answer

If there are varied ways of asking questions, it follows there will be several ways in which they may be answered. It is to the different response modes that we now turn. In all, Tuckman (1972) lists seven such modes.

Unstructured vs. Structured Responses

The first of these is the ‘unstructured response’. This allows the respondent to give her answer in whatever way she chooses.

Example: Why did you not go to university? A ‘structured response’, by contrast, would limit her in some way. Example: Can you give me two reasons for not going to university? Although the interviewer has little control over the unstructured response, it does ensure that the respondent has the freedom to give her own answer as fully as she chooses rather than being constrained in some way by the nature of the question. The chief disadvantage of the unstructured response concerns the matter of quantification. Data yielded in the unstructured response are more difficult to code and quantify than data in the structured response.

Fill-In and Tabular Responses

A ‘fill-in response’ mode requires the respondent to supply rather than choose a response, though the response is often limited to a word or phrase. Example: What is your present occupation? Or How long have you lived at your present address? The difference between the fill-in response and the unstructured response is one of degree. A ‘tabular response’ is similar to a fill-in response though more structured.

Scaled and Ranking Responses

It is thus a convenient and short-hand way of recording complex information. A ‘scaled response’ is one structured by means of a series of gradations. The respondent is required to record her response to a given statement by selecting from a number of alternatives.

Example: What are your chances of reaching a top managerial position within the next five years? Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor Tuckman draws our attention to the fact that, unlike an unstructured response which has to be coded to be useful as data, a scaled response is collected in the form of usable and analyzable data. A ‘ranking response’ is one in which a respondent is required to rank-order a series of words, phrases or statements according to a particular criterion.

Example: Rank order the following people in terms of their usefulness to you as sources of ad vice and guidance on problems you have encountered in the classroom. Use numbers 1 to 5, with 1 representing the person most useful. Education tutor Subject tutor Classteacher Headteacher Other student Ranked data can be analysed by adding up the rank of each response across the respondents, thus resulting in an overall rank order of alternatives.

Checklist and Categorical Responses

A ‘checklist response’ requires that the respondent selects one of the alternatives presented to her. In that they do not represent points on a continuum, they are nominal categories. Example: I get most satisfaction in college from: the social life studying on my own attending lectures college societies giving a paper at a seminar This kind of response tends to yield less information than the other kinds considered. Finally, the ‘categorical response’ mode is similar to the checklist but simpler in that it offers respondents only two possibilities. Example: Material progress results in greater happiness for people True False or

In the event of another war, would you be pre pared to fight for your country? Yes No Summing the numbers of respondents with the same responses yields a nominal measure. As a general rule, the kind of information sought and the means of its acquisition will determine the choice of response mode. Data analysis, then, ought properly to be considered alongside the choice of response mode so that the interviewer can be confident that the data will serve her purposes and analysis of them can be duly prepared.

Relationship Between Response Mode and Data Type

Once the variables to be measured or studied have been identified, questions can be constructed so as to reflect them. It is important to bear in mind that more than one question for mat and more than one response mode may be employed when building up a schedule. The final mixture will depend on the kinds of factors mentioned earlier—the objectives of the research, and so on. Where an interview schedule is to be used by a number of trained interviewers, it will of course be necessary to include in it appropriate instructions for both interviewer and interviewees.

Designing Semi-Structured Interview Schedules

Using Prompts and Probes Effectively

The framing of questions for a semi-structured interview will also need to consider prompts and probes (Morrison, 1993:66). Prompts enable the interviewer to clarify topics or questions, whilst probes enable the inter viewer to ask respondents to extend, elaborate, add to, provide detail for, clarify or qualify their response, thereby addressing richness, depth of response, comprehensiveness and honesty that are some of the hallmarks of successful inter viewing (see also Patton, 1980:238). Hence an interview schedule for a semi-structured interview (i.e. where topics and open ended questions are written but the exact sequence and wording does not have to be followed with each respondent) might include:

The topic to be discussed;
The specific possible questions to be put for each topic;
The issues within each topic to be discussed, together with possible questions for each issue;
A series of prompts and probes for each topic, issue and question.

How Many Interviews Should You Conduct?

How many interviews do I need to conduct?’ is a frequent question of novice researchers, asking both about the numbers of people and the number of interviews with each person. The advice here echoes that of Kvale (1996:101) that one conducts interviews with as many people as necessary in order to gain the information sought.

There is no simple rule of thumb, as this depends on the purpose of the interview, for example, whether it is to make generalizations, to provide in-depth, individual data, to gain a range of responses. Though the reader is directed to the blog post on sampling for fuller treatment of these matters, the issue here is that the inter viewer must ensure that the interviewees selected will be able to furnish the researcher with the information required.

Conducting the Interview

Setting Up and Briefing Respondents

Setting up and conducting the interview will make up the next stage in the procedure. Where the interviewer is initiating the research herself, she will clearly select her own respondents; where she is engaged by another agent, then she will probably be given a list of people to contact. Tuckman (1972) has succinctly reviewed the procedures to adopt at the interview itself.

He writes, At the meeting, the interviewer should brief the respondent as to the nature or purpose of the interview (being as candid as possible without biasing responses) and attempt to make the respondent feel at ease. He should explain the manner in which he will be recording responses, and if he plans to tape record, he should get the respondent’s assent.

At all times, an interviewer must re member that he is a data collection instrument and try not to let his own biases, opinions, or curiosity affect his behaviour. It is important that the interviewer should not deviate from his format and interview schedule although many schedules will permit some flexibility in choice of questions. The respondent should be kept from ram bling away from the essence of a question, but not at the sacrifice of courtesy. (Tuckman, 1972)

The Interview as a Social Encounter

It is crucial to keep uppermost in one’s mind the fact that the interview is a social, interpersonal encounter, not merely a data collection exercise. Indeed Kvale (1996:125) suggests that an interview follows an unwritten script for interactions, the rules for which only surface when they are transgressed. Hence the interviewer must be at pains to conduct the interview carefully and sensitively. Kvale (1996:147) adds that, as the re searcher is the research instrument, the effective interviewer is not only knowledgeable about the subject matter but is also an expert in inter action and communication.

Establishing the Right Atmosphere

The interviewer will need to establish an appropriate atmosphere such that the participant can feel secure to talk freely. This operates at several levels.

Addressing Cognitive and Ethical Dimensions

For example there is the need to address the cognitive aspect of the interview, ensuring that the interviewer is sufficiently knowledgeable about the subject matter that she or he can con duct the interview in an informed manner, and that the interviewee does not feel threatened by lack of knowledge. That this is a particular problem when interviewing children has been documented by Simons (1982) and Lewis (1992), who indicate that children will tend to say anything rather than nothing at all, thereby limiting the possible reliability of the data.

Further, the ethical dimension of the interview needs to be borne in mind, ensuring, for example, informed consent, guarantees of confidentiality, beneficence and non-maleficence (i.e. that the interview may be to the advantage of the respondent and will not harm her).

The issue of ethics also needs to take account of what is to count as data, for example it is often after the cassette recorder or video camera has been switched off that the ‘gems’ of the interview are revealed, or people may wish to say something ‘off the record’; the status of this kind of information needs to be clarified before the interview commences. The ethical aspects of interviewing are more fully discussed later in the next blog posts.

Managing Interpersonal Dynamics

Then there is a need to address the interpersonal, interactional, and communicative and emotional aspects of the interview. For example, the interviewer and interviewee communicate none verbally, by facial and bodily expression. Some thing as slight as a shift in position in a chair might convey whether the researcher is interested, angry, bored, agreeing, disagreeing and so on. Here the interviewer has to be adept at ‘active listening’

The interviewer is also responsible for considering the dynamics of the situation, for ex ample, how to keep the conversation going, how to motivate participants to discuss their thoughts, feelings and experiences, and how to overcome the problems of the likely asymmetries of power in the interview (where the interviewer typically defines the situation, the topic, the conduct, the introduction, the course of the interview, and the closing of the interview) (Kvale, 1996:126)

As Kvale suggests, the interview is not usually a reciprocal interaction between two equal participants. It is important to keep the interview moving forward, and how to achieve this needs to be anticipated by the interviewer, for example by being clear on what one wishes to find out, asking those questions that will elicit the kinds of data sought, giving appropriate verbal and non-verbal feedback to the respondent during the interview. It extends even to considering when the interviewer should keep silent (ibid.: 135).

Directiveness in Interviewing

The ‘defectiveness’’ of the interviewer has been scaled by Whyte (1982), where a six-point scale was devised (1=the least directive, and 6=the most directive):

1 Making encouraging noises.

2 Reflecting on remarks made by the inform ant.

3 Probing on the last remark made by the in formant.

4 Probing an idea preceding the last remark by the informant.

5 Probing an idea expressed earlier in the interview.

6 Introducing a new topic.

This is not to say that the interviewer should avoid being too directive or not directive enough; indeed on occasions a confrontational style might yield much more useful data than a non-confrontational style. Further, it may be in the interests of the research if the interview is sometimes quite tightly controlled, as this might facilitate the subsequent analysis of the data.

For example, if the subsequent analysis will seek to categorize and classify the responses, then it might be useful for the interviewer to clarify meaning and even suggest classifications during the interview (see Kvale, 1996:130). Patton (1980:210) suggests that it is important to maintain the interviewee’s motivation; hence the interviewer must keep boredom at bay, for example by keeping to a minimum demo graphic and background questions.

Language and Communication Strategies

The issue of the interpersonal and interactional elements reaches further, for the language of all speakers has to be considered, for example, translating the academic language of the researcher into the everyday, more easy-going and colloquial language of the interviewee, in order to generate rich descriptions and authentic data. Patton (1980:225) goes on to underline the importance of clarity in questioning, and suggests that this entails the interviewer finding out what terms the interviewees use about the matter in hand, what terms they use amongst themselves, and avoiding the use of academic jargon.

The issue here is not only that the language of the inter viewer must be understandable to interviewees but that it must be part of their frame of reference, such that they feel comfortable with it. This can be pursued even further, suggesting that the age, gender, race, class, dress, language of the interviewers and interviewees will all exert an influence on the interview itself. This is discussed fully in in previous on reliability and validity.

Sequencing and Framing Questions

The sequence and framing of the interview questions will also need to be considered, for ex ample ensuring that easier and less threatening, non-controversial questions are addressed earlier in the interview in order to put respondents at their ease (see Patton, 1980:210–11). This might mean that the ‘what’ questions precede the more searching and difficult ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions (though, as Patton reminds us (ibid.: 211), knowledge questions—‘what’—type questions—can be threatening). The interviewer’s questions should be straightforward and brief, even though the responses need not be (Kvale, 1996:132). It will also need to consider the kinds of questions to be put to interviewees, discussed earlier.

Common Problems and How to Prevent Them

There are several problems in the actual con duct of an interview that can be anticipated and, possibly, prevented, ensuring that the interview proceeds comfortably, for example (see Field and Morse, 1989):

Avoiding interruptions from outside (e.g. Telephone calls, people knocking on the door)
Minimizing distractions
Minimizing the risk of ‘stage fright’ in interviewees and interviewers
Avoiding asking embarrassing or awkward questions
Jumping from one topic to another
Giving advice or opinions (rather than active listening)
Summarizing too early or closing off an interview too soon
Being too superficial
Handling sensitive matters (e.g. Legal matters, personal matters, emotional matters)

Recording Methods: Pros and Cons

There is also the issue of how to record the interview as it proceeds. For example, an audiotape recorder might be unobtrusive but might constrain the respondent; a videotape might yield more accurate data but might be even more constraining, with its connotation of surveillance. Merton et al. (1956) comment on the tendency of taping to ‘cool things down’. It might be less threatening not to have any mechanical means of recording the interview, in which case the reliability of the data might rely on the memory of the interviewer.

An alternative might be to have the interviewer make notes during the interview, but this could be highly off-putting for some respondents. The issue here is that there is a trade-off between the need to catch as much data as possible and yet to avoid having so threatening an environment that it impedes the potential of the interview situation. What is being suggested here is that the interview, as a social encounter, has to take account of, and plan for, the whole range of other, possibly non-cognitive, factors that form part of everyday conduct.

Quality Criteria for Successful Interviews

The ‘ideal’ interview, then, meets several ‘quality criteria’ (Kvale, 1996:145):

The extent of spontaneous, rich, specific, and relevant answers from the interviewee.
The shorter the interviewer’s questions and the longer the subject’s answers, the better.
The degree to which the interviewer follows up and clarifies the meanings of the relevant aspects of the answers.
The ideal interview is to a large extent interpreted throughout the interview.
The interviewer attempts to verify his or her interpretations of the subject’s answers in the course of the interview.
The interview is ‘self-communicating’—it is a story contained in it that hardly requires much extra descriptions and explanations.

Transcribing Interview Data

Understanding Data Loss in Transcription

This is a crucial step, for there is the potential for massive data loss, distortion and the reduction of complexity. We have suggested throughout that the interview is a social encounter, not merely a data collection exercise; the problem with much transcription is that it becomes solely a record of data rather than a record of a social encounter. Indeed this problem might have begun at the data collection stage; for example, an audiotape is selective, it filters out important contextual factors, neglecting the visual and non-verbal aspects of the interview (Mishler, 1986). Indeed it is frequently the non-verbal communication that gives more information than the verbal communication.

The Limitations of Audio and Video Recording

Morrison (1993:63) recounts the incident of an autocratic headteacher extolling the virtues of collegiality and democratic decision-making whilst shaking her head vigorously from side to side and pressing the flat of her hand in a downwards motion away from herself as if to silence discussion! To re place audio recording with video recording might make for richer data and catch non-verbal communication, but this then becomes very time-consuming to analyses. Transcriptions inevitably lose data from the original encounter.

This problem is compounded, for a transcription represents the translation from one set of rule systems (oral and interpersonal) to another very remote rule system (writ ten language). As Kvale (1996:166) suggests the prefix transindicates a change of state or form; transcription is selective transformation. Therefore it is unrealistic to pretend that the data on transcripts are anything but already interpreted data. As Kvale (ibid.: 167) remarks, the transcript can become an opaque screen between the researcher and the original live interview situation.

There can be no single ‘correct’ transcription; rather the issue becomes whether, to what ex tent, and how a transcription is useful for the research. Transcriptions are decontextualized, abstracted from time and space, from the dynamics of the situation, from the live form, and from the social, interactive, dynamic and fluid dimensions of their source; they are frozen. The words in transcripts are not necessarily as solid as they were in the social setting of the interview.

Scheurich (1995:240) suggests that even conventional procedures for achieving re liability are inadequate here, for holding constant the questions, the interviewer, the inter viewee, the time and place does not guarantee stable, unambiguous data. Indeed Mishler (1991:260) suggests that data and the relationship between meaning and language are con textually situated; they are unstable, changing and capable of endless reinterpretation.

We are not arguing against transcriptions, rather, we are cautioning against the researcher believing that they tell everything that took place in the interview. This might require the re searcher to ensure that different kinds of data are recorded in the transcript of the audiotape, for example:

What was being said;
The tone of voice of the speaker(s) (e.g. Harsh, kindly, encouraging);
The inflection of the voice (e.g. Rising or fal ing, a question or a statement, a cadence or a pause, a summarizing or exploratory tone, opening or closing a line of inquiry);
Emphases placed by the speaker;
Pauses (short to long) and silences (short to long);
Interruptions;
The mood of the speaker(s) (e.g. Excited, angry, resigned, bored, enthusiastic, committed, happy, grudging);
The speed of the talk (fast to slow, hurried or unhurried, hesitant to confident);
How many people were speaking simultaneously;
Whether a speaker was speaking continuously or in short phrases;
Who is speaking to whom;
Indecipherable speech;
Any other events that were taking place at the same time that the researcher can recall.

Beyond Words: Capturing Non-Verbal Communication

If the transcript is of videotape, then this enables the researcher to comment on all of the non-verbal communication that was taking place in addition to the features noted from the audiotape. The issue here is that it is often inadequate to transcribe only spoken words; other data are important.

Of course, as soon as other data are noted, this becomes a matter of interpretation (what is a long pause, what is a short pause, was the respondent happy or was it just a ‘front’, what gave rise to such-and-such a question or response, why did the speaker suddenly burst into tears?). As Kvale (1996:183) notes, interviewees’ statements are not simply collected by the interviewer, they are, in reality, co-authored.

https://nurseseducator.com/high-fidelity-simulation-use-in-nursing-education/

First NCLEX Exam Center In Pakistan From Lahore (Mall of Lahore) to the Global Nursing

Categories of Journals: W, X, Y and Z Category Journal In Nursing Education

AI in Healthcare Content Creation: A Double-Edged Sword and Scary

Social Links:

https://www.facebook.com/nurseseducator/

https://www.instagram.com/nurseseducator/

https://www.pinterest.com/NursesEducator/

https://www.linkedin.com/company/nurseseducator/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/nurseseducator/

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Afza-Lal-Din

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=F0XY9vQAAAAJ