Response to Nguyen et al.’s letter regarding “Anteriolateral versus anterior–posterior electrodes in external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical trials”
Key Points:
- Provides a detailed response to Nguyen et al.’s critique.
- Reinforces the comparative effectiveness of anterolateral vs. anterior-posterior electrode placement.
- Highlights methodological rigor and clinical relevance in external cardioversion research.
Description
This response addresses Nguyen et al.’s letter concerning the systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterolateral versus anterior-posterior electrode placement in external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. It clarifies key findings, methodological considerations, and the clinical implications of electrode positioning for effective cardioversion.
Be the first to review “Response to Nguyen et al.’s letter regarding “Anteriolateral versus anterior–posterior electrodes in external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical trials””
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.